Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Investigating barriers to adherence to antimalarial prescribing guidelines in public healthcare facilities in Arba Minch, South Ethiopia: A qualitative study.

Abate Atimut Dereje, Dereje Geleta, Tadesse Menjetta, Abinet Takele, Susana Vaz Nery, Techalew Shimelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abate Atimut DerejeCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Dereje GeletaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Tadesse MenjettaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-604X
Abinet TakeleCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.
Susana Vaz NeryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Techalew ShimelisCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-0482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and prompt treatment of malaria cases are a crucial component of curative and preventive interventions. There have been reports of healthcare workers overprescribing antimalarial agents against guidelines, but the barriers they face in adhering to the guidelines are not well studied. This study aimed to investigate barriers to adherence to guidelines in prescribing antimalarial drugs in public healthcare facilities in Arba Minch, South Ethiopia.

methodA cross-sectional descriptive exploratory qualitative method was employed. We included ten participants from public healthcare facilities, including health centres, a hospital, a city health office, and a zonal health bureau. A key informant interview technique was used to collect data. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Data analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti, version 7.5 software. The results were presented thematically and narrated to support the main themes.

resultsPublic healthcare facilities primarily used blood smear microscopy to test all malaria-suspected patients. However, in cases of microscopy service interruptions or when confirming negative results, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were employed in some facilities. Limited availability of microscopes and reagents, and electric power interruptions hindered reliable microscopy services. Drug stock-outs, patient expectations for antimalarial drugs, self-treatment, and delayed care-seeking are barriers to adherence to malaria treatment guidelines. The main reason for non-adherence to withholding antimalarial drugs after negative tests was greater trust in clinical findings over laboratory results. Confidence in experience contributed to trust in clinical judgment, while perceived inexperience and negligence, inconsistent RDT and microscopy results, and poor-quality control assessment results undermined trust in laboratories. Despite supporting the guidelines, study participants emphasized the need for flexibility to allow empirical treatment and highlighted the lack of training and mentoring for healthcare workers.

conclusionTo improve adherence to malaria treatment guidelines, it is essential to ensure consistent lab operations, enhance quality assurance, maintain effective communication between lab personnel and prescribers, and provide healthcare and patient education. Implementing training and mentoring programs and promoting evidence-based practices are also crucial.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsDrug PrescriptionsGuideline AdherenceHealth FacilitiesMalariaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicQualitative ResearchAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID41296707
PMCPMC12654901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.