ArticlePloS one2025
How social media influences the self-image and body image among female and male adolescents.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Influence of aesthetic beauty models on body image in indigenous communities in Latin America: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Media Use and Psychosocial Health among Adolescent Boys and Young Men.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Early incorporation of body capital in adolescent beauty culture: A qualitative study of the 'Sephora Kids' phenomenon.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parents, peers, and social media are the primary drivers of sociocultural influence among young people, where social media is considered the most pervasive and persuasive of these drivers. However, there is a need for a more nuanced understanding of this influence, considering the differences in how young males and females view their self-images and body images. This study combined qualitative data from focus-group interviews and a national survey to investigate social media influences on Norwegian adolescents' body image and self-image. Forty-eight adolescents (58% females) attending secondary schools mean age 15.9 (age range 15-19 years) participated in eight focus-group interviews. Their responses to the questions about social media's influence on body image were analyzed thematically. The focus group interviews were succeeded six months later by a national survey administered to adolescents (59% females) attending secondary schools with a mean age of 18 (age range 16-20 years). One-hundred-twenty-four responses to social media's impact on their self-images were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Triangulating the data suggested a tendency for social media to have a negative impact on adolescents' body image and self-image. Females, more than males, viewed social media's impact on their self-image as negative, and most of these negative descriptions were related to unattainable ideals and idealized body representations. A deeper insight into the male's experiences through focus groups revealed that males do experience body-image pressure but that it is rarely talked about. Further, from both datasets adolescents take measures to pursue social media for its positive content, whereas, from the interviews, young males used body-related content on social media as motivation to work towards building their ideal masculine body. Body positivity was talked about in the interviews, where females viewed this as positive, whereas males could not relate to this trend. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to shift focus away from appearance-related self-images and reduce body-image pressure on social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.