Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296591›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2025

Health-related quality of life among the patients undergoing dialysis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India.

Jeyanthi Anandraj, Parthibane Sivanantham, Sitanshu Sekhar Kar, Sreejith Parameswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeyanthi AnandrajDepartment of Health Technology Assessment in India Regional Resource Hub, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Parthibane SivananthamDepartment of Health Technology Assessment in India Regional Resource Hub, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Sitanshu Sekhar KarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Sreejith ParameswaranDepartment of Nephrology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives Dialysis is a therapeutic intervention where it is essential to consider patients' quality of life (QOL) as a key aspect of care. This study aims to assess the QOL of patients and identify factors affecting QOL in patients undergoing dialysis. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 140 participants undergoing dialysis at a tertiary care hospital in South India. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, history of co-morbid conditions, and details regarding the duration and type of dialysis were collected. QOL was assessed using the European Quality of Life assessment instrument, the EuroQOL 5-Dimensional 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Results The mean age of the participants was 41 yr (SD±12). Of 140 participants, 96 (68.6%) were men; 80 (57.1%) resided in rural areas. Hypertension was the most common co-existing condition, present in (n=136; 97%) participants. In the QOL assessment, participants reported a total of 86 distinct health states. The most frequently reported states were 11111 (8.6%) and 11121 (2.9%). The health state associated with the poorest quality of life was 55544, reported by one study participant. A majority of participants (86.4%) experienced pain or discomfort, and more than three-fourths (78.6%) reported difficulty performing their usual activities. The mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.581 (95% CI: 0.522-0.639), and the mean EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) score was 49.0 (95% CI: 46.6-51.3). Patients undergoing haemodialysis (0.714) reported a significantly higher quality of life compared to those on peritoneal dialysis (0.512), with a P value of 0.005. Interpretation & conclusions The mean utility score among participants undergoing dialysis reflects a compromised quality of life.

Indexed as

HypertensionKidney Failure, ChronicQuality of LifeRenal DialysisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersChronic kidney diseasedialysisEQ-5D-5Lhaemodialysisperitoneal quality of lifeutility

Identifiers

PMID41296591
PMCPMC12744544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.