ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Challenges & recommendations for identification of human epidermal growth factor receptor -2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer in India: Expert opinion statement.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Results from a recent Phase 3 clinical trial (DESTINY-Breast04) established the efficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with metastatic breast cancer with immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ or 2+ and without in situ hybridization amplification, defining a new category of metastatic breast cancer known as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low. Across studies of patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer, approximately 50 per cent have HER2-low tumours, thereby emphasizing the importance of accurately identifying these tumours. Results from the DESTINY-Breast06 trial further corroborated the DESTINY-Breast04 results showing T-DXd as a new standard of care for patients with HER2-low and HER2-ultralow (defined as IHC score 0 with membrane staining) metastatic breast cancer following one or more lines of hormone therapy. Differentiating between HER2 IHC scores 0 and 1+ shows significant interobserver variability, possibly because the low scores did not have any clinical relevance until now. To establish a standardized approach in scoring of HER2-low tumours in India, a panel of experts comprising histopathologists, molecular pathologists, and clinicians met to discuss guidelines on HER2 testing. The identification of HER2-low expression depends on multiple methodological pre-analytical and analytical variables, including sample handling, fixation, processing, antigen clones, staining methodology, and substrates. The panel also focused on the challenges in the interpretation of HER2-low status. Challenges in the pre-analytical and analytical phases could be addressed by rigorous quality control procedures and training the pathologists. In the post-analytical phase, the subjective mode of HER2 assessment and HER2 intratumoural heterogeneity in HER2-low breast cancer are factors that influence HER2-low assessment. The panel recommended robust standard operating procedures to overcome these challenges. The central point of discussion was to implement clear guidelines, careful supervision of pre-analytical and analytical issues, and specialized training for accurate HER2 testing that would help select patients eligible for novel therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.