ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2025
Radioprotectors & mitigators in radiation therapy: Harnessing diverse pathways for optimizing clinical outcomes.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Molecular Hydrogen and Vitamin C Treatment in Irradiated Normal and Cancer Cell Models: An Exploratory In Vitro Study and Case Reports.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Citraconic acid mitigates radiation-induced intestinal injury by modulating IL-17 signaling to enhance epithelial regeneration.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radioprotectors are agents that protect normal tissues from the harmful effects of radiation during cancer treatment. Combining these protective agents with advanced radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and proton therapy offers a promising strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing normal tissue toxicity. However, despite extensive research and the identification of numerous potential radioprotectors, only a few have made it into clinical practice. It is primarily because the transition from laboratory research to clinical application faces significant challenges. These include adverse side effects, lack of tissue specificity, complex regulatory requirements, and the high cost of development and implementation. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach. Streamlined regulatory pathways and increased funding for translational research can further accelerate the clinical adoption of these agents. This paper reviews the landscape of radioprotector research, examining the biological mechanisms, clinical trials, and challenges that have limited the clinical translation of many promising agents. This review underscores the critical need for continued research and innovation to bridge the gap between experimental radioprotectors and viable clinical treatments, aiming to enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.