ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Prospective Respiratory Motion Correction Using Machine Learning and Pilot Tone (PROMPT) in Cardiac MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of bedside ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in preparing tracheostomised patients for ventilator liberation and decannulation: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Prospective Respiratory Motion Correction Using Machine Learning and Pilot Tone (PROMPT) in Cardiac MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo implement and evaluate the feasibility of a Pilot Tone (PT)-based prospective gating and tracking technique, which uses a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict respiratory motion from PT signals.
methodsA subject-specific calibration scan consisting of 100 ECG-triggered single-shot images was performed. Respiratory motion was estimated from the images and PT data were processed to extract the respiratory component. The LSTM model was trained to predict respiratory motion from PT signals. During respiratory-corrected scans, PROMPT-predicted slice-shifting parameters were used to update gating information and slice position for each heartbeat before image acquisition. The method was retrospectively evaluated in 12 healthy volunteers, comparing LSTM with linear and polynomial regression models using normalized root mean square error in decibels (NRMSE
resultsThe LSTM model achieved an NRMSE
conclusionThe proposed respiratory motion correction approach was successfully implemented. The LSTM-based predictive model outperformed linear and polynomial regression models. In LGE imaging, PROMPT significantly reduced in-plane motion and showed potential for limiting through-plane motion compared to the clinical protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.