Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296481›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Emergency Department Utilization by Veterans for Low-Acuity Conditions After Virtual Care Expansion.

Anu Ramachandran, Linda Diem Tran, Steven Asch, Derek Boothroyd, Amy Justice, Louise Davies, Anita Vashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anu RamachandranCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Linda Diem TranHealth Economics Resource Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Steven AschCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Derek BoothroydQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Amy JusticeVA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.
Louise DaviesSection of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, VA Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Anita VashiCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low-acuity conditions account for 60% of emergency department (ED) visits within the Veterans Affairs Health System (VA). The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid expansion of VA virtual care, but the impact on low-acuity ED utilization remains unknown. Objective: To examine patterns in low-acuity VA ED visits before and after the expansion of virtual care and to assess whether changes in alternative care use were associated with ED utilization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study used an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate monthly patterns in low-acuity ED visits from March 1, 2017, through February 28, 2023, using VA Corporate Data Warehouse encounter data supplemented with administrative claims from the Office of Integrated Veteran Care. Participants included veterans presenting for acute unscheduled care at EDs within the VA. Secondary analyses included patient characteristics of low-acuity ED users and associations between ED and alternative care utilization. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2024, to August 30, 2025. Exposures: System-wide expansion of VA virtual care from March 15 to May 30, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome consisted of monthly counts of low-acuity visits to VA EDs. Results: The sample included 10 364 893 VA ED visits made by 2 592 998 veterans (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [16.1] years; 9 284 407 [89.6%] by male patients). Low-acuity ED utilization dropped by 24 514 (95% CI, 12 351-36 677) visits (P < .001) in March 2020. From May 2020 onward, low-acuity visits increased by a mean of 7863 (95% CI, 93-15 633) per month (P = .047) but remained 12.4% below baseline by the end of the study period. High-acuity ED visits showed similar patterns. No association was observed between virtual care utilization and reductions in ED use for selected low-acuity conditions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional, national study of ED visits within the VA, low-acuity utilization declined following the expansion of virtual care; however, evidence of direct substitution was not detected. These findings highlight shifting care patterns within the VA and underscore the need for further research on quality, access, and system-level outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalPatient Acceptance of Health CareTelemedicineVeteransAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2United StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID41296481
PMCPMC12658669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.