ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2025
Primary care physicians prescribe fewer expensive combination medications than dermatologists for acne: A retrospective review.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany dermatologic medications are available as expensive combination products, though their lower-cost, generic components are available. Underutilization of these cheaper replacements is common and influenced by several factors, including prescriber's knowledge and disease severity.
objectiveTo characterize differences in prescribing patterns for high- vs lower-cost dermatologic agents for acne between dermatologists and primary care physicians (PCPs).
methodsUsing an administrative insurance claims database, IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics, we identified medication claims between January 01, 2017, and June 30, 2022. Inclusion criteria were claims for high-cost medications and lower-cost alternatives for patients diagnosed with acne. We excluded patients without continuous insurance enrollment for the previous year. Data collected included patient, prescriber, and prescription characteristics. Distribution of costs to payers and patients were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
resultsWe identified 7,843 patients with medication claims meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. High- vs low-cost acne medications cost insurers a median $480.6 (IQR: 377.2-535.2) vs $81.8 (IQR: 30.3-162.3), respectively, whereas patient burden was $60.0 (IQR: 40.0-182.4) vs $15.0 (IQR: 10.0-35.4). Dermatologists prescribed the largest number of acne medications, 7,648 of 9,791 (78.1%), and a higher proportion of high-cost medications (7.8% vs 1.3% for PCPs,
conclusionsDermatologists prescribed a higher percentage of high-cost medications for acne. These differences resulted in a slightly higher distribution of costs to the patient but lower for the insurer, as median is a better indicator of the cost distribution. System processes to identify high-cost combination medications and provide low-cost alternatives may further reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.