ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Axial deviation of anastomosis: a risk factor for leakage in retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough retrosternal route reconstruction is commonly used in esophagectomy, its anatomical constraints may increase the risk of anastomotic leakage because of the compression of reconstructed organs and deformation of the anastomosis. Therefore, this study retrospectively investigated the effect of anastomosis deformation on leakage.
methodsIn this study, 228 patients who underwent esophagectomy with the McKeown method and triangular anastomosis between 2009 and 2022 were included. The postoperative computed tomography images were analyzed to measure the axial deviation of the esophagogastric anastomosis in the coronal (AD-C) and sagittal (AD-S) images. Moreover, the relationship between axial deviation and anastomotic leakage was examined.
resultsNo significant differences were observed between patients with and without anastomotic leakage in terms of patient background, cancer stage, or surgical technique. However, the patients with anastomotic leakage had significantly greater AD-C and AD-S values than those without. Multivariate analysis identified AD-C > 20° as an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (odds ratio, 4.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-11.92; p < 0.01).
conclusionsThe axial deviation of the esophagogastric anastomosis is a potential risk factor for anastomotic leakage during retrosternal reconstruction. Further studies incorporating three-dimensional imaging and biomechanical analysis are needed to clarify its impact and optimize the anastomotic geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.