ReviewLa Radiologia medica2026
Incidental pulmonary findings on CT in daily practice: the nodule and the interstitial lung abnormalities - what's old, what's new.
Review in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing use of computed tomography (CT) in clinical practice has led to an increase in incidental pulmonary findings, with nodules being among the most commonly encountered. Managing these nodules remains a significant challenge in clinical radiology. In addition to nodules, interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) have emerged as a newly defined entity, necessitating recognition to prevent underestimation and misinterpretation, as well as to guide appropriate management. This review aims to examine the interpretation of incidental pulmonary nodules, providing clarity on their management and addressing gaps not covered by the 2017 Fleischner Society Guidelines. Additionally, we focus on recent updates related to ILA classification, as outlined by the Fleischner Society, and highlight key radiologic features critical for distinguishing ILAs from non-ILA alterations. Finally, we explore the potential future developments in the evaluation of ILAs, offering insights into how the radiologists' role in managing these abnormalities may evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.