Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296242›Full record

ArticleCurrent environmental health reports2025

How Do We Know What We Know About Consumer Attitudes Towards Meat Sustainability? A Scoping Review of Studies Published Globally Between 2010-2022.

Cecilia Msogoya, Jennifer J Otten, Clair E Werch, Olivia Meader Yetter, Elizabeth Abraham, Hannah McKinley, Charlotte Wolfert, Sarah M Collier, Marie L Spiker

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cecilia MsogoyaProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer J OttenProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Clair E WerchProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Olivia Meader YetterProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth AbrahamInstitute On the Environment (IonE), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Hannah McKinleyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Charlotte WolfertUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah M CollierProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marie L SpikerProgram in Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA. mspiker@uw.edu.

Funding

USDA NIFA 2022-68006-37269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis scoping review characterizes research on consumer attitudes towards meat sustainability, with a focus on environmental impact and animal welfare, from peer-reviewed articles and gray literature sources published globally between 2010-2022. RECENT

findingsConsumers are important levers of change for advancing meat sustainability. While more narrowly focused systematic reviews exist, consumer attitudes are complex and this area is methodologically diverse. Analysis of 512 peer-reviewed articles and 31 gray literature sources revealed growth in this area since 2010. Included studies spanned 65 countries, with more representation from higher-income countries, especially in earlier years. Consumer attitudes are multidimensional, which is reflected in the wide array of attitudinal constructs and methodological approaches in this literature. Most studies examined consumer attitudes towards multiple species or towards meat or livestock in general. While climate impacts were the most commonly studied specific sustainability consideration, lending some support to the "carbon tunnel vision" hypothesis, the most common approach was to study environmental impact or animal welfare only at a general level, which we characterize as a "blurred vision"-a lack of focus on specific sustainability considerations, and their complexity and tradeoffs. Peer-reviewed and gray literature sources offer complementary perspectives, with many gray literature sources leveraging large public opinion polls and many peer-reviewed articles studying the mechanisms behind these polls. We recommend engaging broadly with multiple methodological approaches, and with both peer-reviewed and gray literature. Advancing the sustainability of animal agriculture requires the exchange of research findings across multiple scientific disciplines and sectors.

Indexed as

AttitudeConsumer BehaviorMeatAnimalsAnimal WelfareHumansAnimal welfareConsumer attitudesEnvironmental impactMeatSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41296242
PMCPMC12657574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.