ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Prediction of transplant rejection using non-coding RNAs.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although transplantation remains a life-saving treatment for organ failure, long-term patient survival continues to be severely limited by the risk of allograft rejection. Preventing rejection remains a critical challenge despite significant advancements in surgical techniques, organ availability, and immunosuppressive therapies. The primary goal of transplantation research is to achieve immune tolerance to transplanted allografts. Although tissue biopsy remains the most reliable method for diagnosing acute rejection (AR), recent advances in molecular diagnostics have revealed novel genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers. These biomarkers hold significant potential for extending organ longevity by enabling early rejection detection and guiding personalized treatment strategies. Current surveillance transplanted patients relies heavily on serum biochemical tests, which help identify and treat asymptomatic rejection, a condition with excellent prognosis when addressed early. However, there is a critical need for non- or minimally invasive biomarkers that are both sensitive and reliable, capable of supplementing or replacing invasive biopsies, and reducing dependence on conventional biochemical markers. This study aimed to provide an overview of the available data on the importance of ncRNA expression patterns in predicting and monitoring transplant rejection, which offers a promising avenue for improving post-transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.