Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296203›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Evaluation of high dose post-dialytic versus daily beta-lactam dosing in hemodialysis patients using Monte Carlo simulation.

Andrew J Bauman, Olivia G Caiazza, Nerissa Wan, Sydnee Payer, Olivia G Pauly, Sierra Shoemaker, Susan J Lewis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew J BaumanCollege of Pharmacy, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA.
Olivia G CaiazzaDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals, Warrensville Heights, OH, USA.
Nerissa WanDepartment of Pharmacy, HonorHealth Sonoran Crossing Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sydnee PayerCollege of Pharmacy, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA.
Olivia G PaulyDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic - Hillcrest Hospital, Mayfield Heights, OH, USA.
Sierra ShoemakerCollege of Pharmacy, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA.
Susan J LewisDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Findlay, Findlay, OH, USA. slewis@findlay.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDaily intravenous dosing of cefepime, meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam is recommended in patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), but requires hospitalization or frequent clinic visits. High dose post-HD administration may offer a more convenient outpatient alternative, but supporting data is limited.

aimTo evaluate the feasibility by assessing predicted pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment and neurotoxicity risk of high-dose post-HD versus daily dosing strategies for cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime/avibactam in patients receiving thrice-weekly IHD, using the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) techniques.

methodOne-compartment pharmacokinetic models were developed using published data to simulate drug exposure in anuric patients receiving 4-h IHD thrice-weekly. MCS (Crystal Ball, Oracle) assessed the probability of target attainment (PTA) and neurotoxicity risk of various post-HD and daily dosing regimens in 5,000 virtual cohorts for one week. The PK/PD targets were ≥ 60% fT > MIC for cefepime, ≥ 40% fT > MIC for meropenem and ≥ 50% fT > MIC for ceftazidime with ≥ 50% fT > 1 g/mL for avibactam, assuming Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterobactarales infections. A PTA ≥ 90% was considered optimal for PK/PD target attainment. Safety was also assessed using the neurotoxicity thresholds.

resultsAll daily regimens achieved PTA ≥ 90% on all simulated days. High-dose post-HD cefepime (1-2 g) and meropenem (2 g) maintained acceptable PTA over 2-day interdialytic periods, but failed to sustain targets through the 3-day period. Ceftazidime/avibactam post-HD dosing (0.94 g-0.94 g-2.5 g) maintained ≥ 90% PTA for ceftazidime throughout the week, though avibactam fell slightly below target on the final day. Predicted neurotoxicity risk was negligible for meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam, but elevated with higher cefepime doses (1-2 g post-HD and 1 g daily). Cefepime 0.5 g daily, meropenem 0.25-1 g daily, and ceftazidime/avibactam 0.94 g daily or 0.94 g-0.94 g-2.5 g post-HD attained both PK/PD targets and safety targets.

conclusionHigh-dose post-HD dosing appears feasible for ceftazidime/avibactam but may be inadequate for cefepime and meropenem over a 3-day interdialytic period. Elevated neurotoxicity risk predicted with higher cefepime doses highlights the importance of cautious dosing and consideration of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsMonte Carlo MethodRenal DialysisAzabicyclo CompoundsCefepimeCeftazidimeComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsHumansMeropenemModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamsCefepimeCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsMeropenemCefepimeCeftazidime/avibactamHemodialysisMeropenemMonte Carlo simulationPharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamicsPost-HD dosing

Identifiers

PMID41296203
PMCPMC12992419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.