ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Prognostic value of Layer-Specific global longitudinal strain in patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical value of perioperative myocardial strain assessment by transesophageal speckle-tracking echocardiography in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the prognostic value of layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study comprised 641 patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2006 and 2011. Layer-specific GLS was assessed by echocardiography using two-dimensional speckle tracking. Patients were followed through nation-wide registries for all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF), and the composite endpoint of HF or cardiovascular death (CVD) (HF/CVD).
resultsDuring follow-up (3.8 years [IQR: 2.7; 4.9]), 73 patients died, and 62 developed HF/CVD (HF: n = 30, CVD: n = 38). Patients who died had reduced GLS in all layers; GLSendo (-14.2% vs. - 16.3%, p < 0.001), whole wall GLS (-12.1% vs. - 13.9%, p < 0.001), and GLSepi (-10.6% vs. - 12.2%, p < 0.001). The risk of death increased linearly with decreasing absolute GLS for all layers (p < 0.0002). In multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical and echocardiographic baseline characteristics, all layer-specific strain parameters remained significantly associated with mortality. However, only GLSepi remained significant after adjusting for European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II); (GLSepi: HR = 1.09 (1.00-1.18), p = 0.043, per 1% absolute decrease). For secondary outcomes (HF and HF/CVD), all strain parameters were associated with HF/CVD in fully adjusted models; however, no layer was independently associated with HF after multivariable analysis.
conclusionLayer-specific GLS is an independent prognosticator of all-cause mortality, HF, and HF/CVD. In multivariable models for mortality, GLSepi provided significant prognostic value after adjusting for EuroSCORE II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.