ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Exploring biomarkers for keratoconus: current insights and future directions.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Update on the Physiopathology of Keratoconus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tannic Acid Achieves Rapid Scar-Free Corneal Healing by Chelating Excess Copper to Suppress Aberrant LOX-Mediated Fibrosis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Sex Hormones and Keratoconus: In Search of the Link.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal disorder characterized by thinning of the cornea and conical protrusion leading to distorted vision and blindness. The disease often marks in adolescence and progresses until the mid-40s, with varying degrees of severity. Global prevalence shows regional variation, with higher rates in Asian populations and strong associations with systemic conditions such as Down syndrome. The current study investigates the underlying pathological mechanism with a focus on biomarkers, including Prolactin-Induced Protein (PIP), Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs), Interleukins, and genetic markers as LOX and FOXO1. While the clinical appearance may be highly variable with relevant distorted vision, the pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Generally, it affects teenagers, young adults, and has been related to pathological factors like oxidative stress, environmental influences, hormonal changes, and eye rubbing. Although with the progress of diagnostic modalities from corneal topography and tomography to tear-based assays and artificial intelligence, it is still a challenge to diagnose it early. The involvement of systemic and local inflammatory responses in KC is now an area of increasing interest, implying that targeting these pathways will provide new treatment options. Besides, progress in tear-based diagnostics offers promising paths for non-invasive monitoring of disease progression. Clarifying the biochemical and genetic profile of keratoconus may help to focus on better diagnosis. The present review will increase our insights into keratoconus pathophysiology and encourage new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that can eventually enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.