SynthesisAnimal cognition2025
A systematic review on the effect of individual characteristics and management practices on equine cognition.
Synthesis in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equine cognition is relevant to the many roles that horses serve in society, such as leisure riding, competitions, or even animal-assisted therapy. Equine cognitive abilities have been explored in recent years. However, gaining an overview of horse cognition is challenging due to the broad range of abilities studied and the diverse methodologies employed. In addition, the subjects of existing equine cognition studies vary greatly in contextual factors such as their breed, age, sex, and management conditions - each of which may influence test performance in the following cognitive categories: Discrimination Learning; Learning Sets, Categorisation and Concept Formation; Spatial Cognition; Social Learning; and Memory. The aims of this review were (1) to establish whether contextual information was provided in research articles on horse cognition, (2) to tabulate information on the characteristics, housing, and management of subjects used in different categories of cognitive test, (3) to provide an overview of cognitive abilities demonstrated by horses, i.e., the results obtained in cognitive tests, with a specific emphasis on the contextual factors shaping them. The results of this review highlighted important points for future research. Better reporting of subject characteristics in scientific publications would enable investigation of the factors which shape horses' cognitive abilities, and the use of standardized methods and procedures across studies would facilitate future comparative work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.