Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296124›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2026

Beyond mediation: the direct effect of expectations on the illusion of control.

Carlos M Vera, Pedro R Montoro, Cristina Orgaz, María José Contreras

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos M VeraEscuela Internacional de Doctorado UNED. Programa de Doctorado en Psicología, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain. cvera81@alumno.uned.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0617-1789
Pedro R MontoroDepartamento de Psicología Básica I, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-8587
Cristina OrgazDepartamento de Psicología Básica I, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-6869
María José ContrerasDepartamento de Psicología Básica I, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-5238

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-125677OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do our prior beliefs influence our judgments (if at all)? This study uses an expectation-inducing task to assess the influence of prior expectations on efficacy judgments in an illusion of control task. The study was conducted online with 150 psychology undergraduate students. The experiment used a between-subjects design. Participants were assigned to one of two groups, with each group being exposed to either a low or high level of expected efficacy. Following the expectation-inducing task, participants performed a standard associative learning task often used to assess the illusion of control. Interestingly, the effect of group assignments influenced the contingency judgments provided by the participants in the standard task both directly and indirectly through impact on their behavior. Although the indirect effect had been reported in previous illusion of control research, the direct effect of expectations in contingency judgments using casual mediation assessments is a novel result.

Indexed as

Association LearningIllusionsJudgmentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.