Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296077›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2025

Synergies and other behaviors in the context of the referent control theory of action and perception.

Anatol G Feldman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anatol G FeldmanDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. feldman@med.umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hindlimb of the spinalized frog when supported on a flat surface, can produce a precise wiping reflex to remove a small piece of paper soaked in a weak acidic solution placed on the forelimb. By passively changing the forelimb position, one can modify the body schema and the coordinates of the skin irritant relative to the body, but the frog still manages to remove the irritant and accurately wipe the affected skin spot several times. Similarly, healthy humans are able to preserve movement precision of hammering despite a broad variability in arm movement leading to variability in the hammer trajectory (Bernstein's example of synergy). An explanation of the neural mechanisms underlying these synergies, heretofore unknown, is proposed in the present paper. This is done in the framework of the referent control theory (RCT), an extension of the equilibrium-point hypothesis that is applicable to many members of the biological kingdom including humans and frogs. The RCT is also helpful in solving the classical posture-movement problem and in explaining the directional tuning of neurons and the role of proprioception in action-perception coupling. Experimental tests of the RCT in future studies are proposed in comparison with other theories of action and perception. It is suggested that the RCT represents a paradigm shift in the understanding of action and perception by implying that they are controlled by specific parameters of physical and physiological laws.

Indexed as

PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementPostureProprioceptionAction-perception couplingEquilibrium-Point hypothesisMotor controlReferent frames

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.