ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Priapism: current status and new insights].
Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend a strictly structured, stepwise approach to the management of priapism-from diagnosis and emergency treatment to prevention. New imaging techniques, especially magnetic resonance imaging, and emerging therapies (e.g., antithrombotic strategies) are promising but require further evidence-based studies before they can be integrated into clinical practice. In the acute setting, a structured treatment algorithm should be adhered to, beginning with cavernosal aspiration of up to 500 ml of blood, with or without intracavernosal phenylephrine administration. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is indicated, ranging from the creation of a shunt to early implantation of a penile prosthesis. In this context, distal shunt techniques have surpassed proximal approaches in clinical preference. A newly described penoscrotal decompression technique has been mentioned as an innovative surgical option. In nonischemic priapism, the primary treatment strategy remains conservative. If conservative measures fail, multiple embolization procedures are preferred over surgical ligation, if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41296073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.