Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41296073›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Priapism: current status and new insights].

Viktoria Stühler, Katharina Friederich, Richard Spallek, Igor Tsaur

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Viktoria StühlerKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Katharina FriederichKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Richard SpallekKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Igor TsaurKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. Igor.Tsaur@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend a strictly structured, stepwise approach to the management of priapism-from diagnosis and emergency treatment to prevention. New imaging techniques, especially magnetic resonance imaging, and emerging therapies (e.g., antithrombotic strategies) are promising but require further evidence-based studies before they can be integrated into clinical practice. In the acute setting, a structured treatment algorithm should be adhered to, beginning with cavernosal aspiration of up to 500 ml of blood, with or without intracavernosal phenylephrine administration. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is indicated, ranging from the creation of a shunt to early implantation of a penile prosthesis. In this context, distal shunt techniques have surpassed proximal approaches in clinical preference. A newly described penoscrotal decompression technique has been mentioned as an innovative surgical option. In nonischemic priapism, the primary treatment strategy remains conservative. If conservative measures fail, multiple embolization procedures are preferred over surgical ligation, if necessary.

Indexed as

PriapismHumansMalePenile prothesisPharmacological therapyPreventionShunt surgerySickle cell anemia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.