Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41295873›Full record

ArticleToxins2025

Early Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection May Improve Motor Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Secondary Analysis from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Alessandro Picelli, Andrea Santamato, Michela Cosma, Alessio Baricich, Carmelo Chisari, Marzia Millevolte, Cristina Del Prete, Ilenia Mazzù, Rita Di Censo, Nicola Smania and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessandro PicelliSection of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3558-8276
Andrea SantamatoSpasticity and Movement Disorders "ReSTaRt", Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-8485
Michela CosmaNeuroscience and Rehabilitation Department, Ferrara University Hospital, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Alessio BaricichDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-6283
Carmelo ChisariSection of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-7738
Marzia MillevolteNeurorehabilitation Unit, Ancona University Hospital, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Cristina Del PreteDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, ASL Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Ilenia MazzùIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Rita Di CensoSection of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-4013
Nicola SmaniaSection of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-1887
Mirko FilippettiSection of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-5974

Funding

Ipsen 000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity after stroke impairs motor control, delays recovery, and reduces quality of life. Botulinum toxin type A is the first-line treatment, but it is often administered in the chronic phase, potentially limiting its impact on rehabilitation. Emerging evidence suggests that earlier treatment may enhance recovery, though functional benefits remain uncertain. We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, longitudinal cohort study to investigate whether the timing of the first botulinum toxin type A injection influences outcomes in post-stroke patients naïve to this treatment. All participants received botulinum toxin injections combined with conventional rehabilitation. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-injection. The primary outcome was muscle tone; secondary outcomes included motor strength, sensorimotor recovery, and global disability. Statistical analyses used mixed-effects models and trend tests. Patients treated within 90 days of stroke onset showed greater reductions in spasticity at 4 and 12 weeks compared with later treatment. Despite having more severe baseline impairments, early treated patients demonstrated faster and more pronounced improvements in upper-limb strength, sensorimotor recovery, and global disability. Early toxin administration is associated with enhanced reduction in spasticity and improved motor recovery, particularly in patients with severe initial deficits.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsStrokeAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsbotulinum toxinsmuscle spasticityrehabilitationtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID41295873
PMCPMC12656218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.