ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
The Combined Application of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections and Photobiomodulation Improves Clinical Outcomes in Dogs with Osteoarthritis-Results of a Long-Term, Double-Blinded, Crossover Study.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the Translational Research Structure of Photobiomodulation in Osteoarthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of a mesotherapy protocol vs. an epidural injection of platelet-rich plasma or methylprednisolone in degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs - a retrospective study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thirty dogs were equally assigned to a platelet-rich plasma group (PRPG), a photobiomodulation group (PBMTG), or a combined therapies group (PRP + PBMTG). Response to treatment was evaluated with weight-bearing distribution and different owner-reported outcome measures. Evaluations were conducted at 0, +8, +15, +30, +60, +90, +120, +150, and +180 days after the initial treatment. After the first 180 days, a crossover was performed, and a second 180-day follow-up was conducted. A second cross-over was performed, with a final 180-day follow-up. Nineteen males and eleven females were included, with a mean age of 9.4 ± 2.7 years and a body weight of 26.6 ± 3.8 kg. Six hips were classified as mild, eighteen as moderate, and six as severe. All treatments were able to produce clinically significant improvements in different evaluation modalities, with varied degrees of magnitude and duration. At the last follow-up, the combination of PRP and PBMT had a greater effect, showing a significant difference compared to the isolated treatments, with a moderate to large effect size. Kaplan-Meier estimators showed that PRP + PBMTG had more extended periods with better results. PRP and PBMT could improve objective outcomes and client-reported outcome measures in dogs with OA. Their combined use leads to greater, longer-lasting, clinically significant improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.