ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Engineering the Morphology and Properties of MoS
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The morphology, structure, and composition of CVD-grown molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) films were investigated under varying precursor vapor pressures. Increasing sulfur vapor pressure transformed the film morphology from well-defined triangular domains to structures dominated by sulfur-terminated zigzag edges. These morphological changes were accompanied by notable variations in both structural and electrical properties. Non-uniform precursor vapor distribution promoted the formation of intrinsic point defects. To elucidate this behavior, a thermodynamic model was developed to link growth parameters to native defect formation. The analysis considered molybdenum and sulfur vacancies in both neutral and charged states, with equilibrium concentrations determined from the corresponding defect formation reactions. Sulfur vapor pressure emerged as the dominant factor controlling defect concentrations. The model validated experimental observations, with films grown under optimum and sulfur-rich conditions, yielding a carrier concentration of 9.6×1011 cm-2 and 7.5×1011 cm-2, respectively. The major difference in the field-effect transistor (FET) performance of devices fabricated under these two conditions was the degradation of the field-effect mobility and the current switching ratio. The degradation observed is attributed to increased carrier scattering at charged vacancy defect sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.