ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025
High-Resolution Geospatial Analysis of Dengue Vulnerability in Urban and Rural Areas of San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim was to analyze the temporal evolution and spatial distribution of classic and hemorrhagic dengue in the Mexican state of San Luis Potosí at the basic geostatistical area (BGA) level and to develop multivariate models to estimate the population's degree of vulnerability. METHODOLOGY: Classic and hemorrhagic dengue cases for 2015-2020 were obtained from the Mexican Ministry of Health, georeferenced at the pixel level, and subsequently grouped by BGA. Environmental, proximity, and social variables were obtained from official sites: IMTA, SMN, USGS, and INEGI. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed using PASW Statistics v. 18 software to estimate the degree of vulnerability, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to validate them.
resultsA total of 125, 128, 109, 624, 1580, and 1817 dengue cases were identified for 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. The major factors contributing to the vulnerability of classic dengue fever included population, temperature, and distance to agricultural areas. For hemorrhagic dengue, the contributing factors were temperature, population, and mean annual rainfall. Vulnerability prediction was determined by taking the area under the curve values, which were 0.957 for classic dengue fever and 0.930 for hemorrhagic dengue, both indicating a "very good ability" to predict.
conclusionsThese results can be used to design and implement targeted strategies, particularly for modifiable factors, such as prevention measures directed towards populated areas and the improvement of sewage systems, in addition to non-modifiable factors, such as temperature and rainfall. This method can be replicated as an additional tool to address this public health issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.