ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Dose-Dependent Analysis of Image Quality in Pediatric Head CT Scans Across Different Scanners to Optimize Clinical Protocols Using Phantom-Based Assessment.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesOptimization of pediatric head computed tomography (CT) protocols is essential to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Previous studies mainly relied on phantom-based measurements or visual assessments, and validation using clinical images remains limited. This study aimed to establish quantitative thresholds for noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in pediatric head CT by integrating multicenter clinical data with phantom evaluations.
methodsA multicenter retrospective study was conducted using CT systems from eight hospitals, combined with Catphan phantom experiments and pediatric head CT data. Scan parameters, automatic exposure control settings, and reconstruction methods were collected. Image quality was quantified by the standard deviation (SD) of noise and CNR obtained from regions of interest in gray and white matter. Radiation dose was represented by CTDIvol. Relationships among CTDIvol, SD, and CNR were analyzed across scanners from three manufacturers (Canon, FUJI, and GE).
resultsConsistent dose-response trends were observed across institutions and manufacturers. Image noise decreased as CTDIvol increased, but reached a plateau at higher doses. CNR improved with dose escalation, then stabilized. Both phantom experiments and clinical analyses identified a target SD of 5 and CNR of 2 as optimal indicators for pediatric head CT.
conclusionsQuantitative thresholds were determined as practical indicators for balancing diagnostic image quality with dose reduction. Further reduction may be achieved through advanced reconstruction methods, such as deep learning-based algorithms. These findings may contribute to standardizing pediatric head CT protocols and supporting safer and more effective diagnostic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.