ArticleVaccines2025
Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Variants WT and XBB.1.9: Assessing Vulnerabilities and Preparedness.
Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Elicits a Strong Mucosal Antibody Response That May Facilitate Quicker Mucosal Viral Clearance.Viruses · 2026Article
- Multiple sclerosis patients under treatment with interferon β1-a or ocrelizumab exhibit different T and B cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced immune evasion capabilities poses ongoing challenges for maintaining population-level immunity. This study aim to evaluate neutralizing antibody responses to the wild-type (WT) strain and the Omicron sublineage XBB.1.9 in the Israeli population using serum samples collected between August 2022 and January 2023, prior to widespread circulation of XBB.1.9.
methodsPseudovirus-based microneutralization assays incorporating variant-specific spike proteins were employed to measure neutralizing geometric mean titers (GMTs) across subgroups categorized by age, gender, socioeconomic status, and geographic region.
resultsNeutralizing titers against XBB.1.9 were significantly lower than those against WT across all demographic groups, with a 29-fold reduction in neutralization activity against XBB.1.9, underscoring the immune escape potential of XBB.1.9. For WT, older adults (≥65 years) exhibited higher titers than younger individuals (
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate substantially reduced neutralization of XBB.1.9 compared to WT and reveal disparities in WT immunity by age and region. The results emphasize the need for updated vaccines targeting immune-evasive variants and for tailored vaccination strategies to address regional and demographic gaps in protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.