Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41295537›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Brief Comparison of Novel Influenza Vaccine Design Strategies.

Shiqi Chai, Chuantao Ye, Chao Fan, Hong Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiqi ChaiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China.
Chuantao YeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-2757
Chao FanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China.
Hong JiangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2075-3272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza viruses remain a major global public health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality annually despite widespread vaccination efforts. The limitations of current seasonal vaccines, including strain-specific efficacy and manufacturing delays, have accelerated the development of next-generation candidates aiming for universal protection. This review comprehensively summarizes the recent progress in universal influenza vaccine research. We first outline the key conserved antigenic targets, such as the hemagglutinin (HA) stem, neuraminidase (NA), and matrix proteins (M2e, NP, and M1), which are crucial for eliciting broad cross-reactive immunity. We then delve into advanced antigen design strategies, including immunofocusing, multi-antigen combinations, computationally optimized broadly reactive antigens (COBRA), and nanoparticle-based platforms. Furthermore, we evaluate evolving vaccine delivery systems, from traditional inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines to modern mRNA and viral vector platforms, alongside the critical role of novel adjuvants in enhancing immune responses. The convergence of these disciplines-structural biology, computational design, and nanotechnology-is driving the field toward a transformative goal. We conclude that the successful development of a universal influenza vaccine will likely depend on the strategic integration of these innovative approaches to overcome existing immunological and logistical challenges, ultimately providing durable and broad-spectrum protection against diverse influenza virus strains.

Indexed as

delivery platformdesign strategiesinfluenzavaccinevirus

Identifiers

PMID41295537
PMCPMC12656790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.