ReviewVaccines2025
Shaping Antitumor Immunity with Peptide Vaccines: Implications of Immune Modulation at the Vaccine Site.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small but mighty: Peptides as next-generation immunotargeting agents in gynecological cancers.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Beyond priming: a sequential, feedback-guided adjuvant framework for therapeutic cancer peptide vaccines in immunologically cold tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer vaccines have emerged as a class of therapeutics designed to harness the immune system to stimulate durable anti-tumor responses with lower systemic toxicity than conventional therapies. Many platforms have been explored, including protein, peptide, DNA, RNA, and cell-based vaccines. Within this landscape, peptide vaccines remain a promising approach. Most clinical trials have examined peripheral immune responses and clinical outcomes, but there is growing interest in the vaccine site microenvironment (VSME) as a window to understand local immune activation and its implications for systemic immunity and tumor control. Studies of the VSME have investigated the effects of adjuvants, local immune cell dynamics, and their correlation with systemic responses and outcomes. Local adjuvants typically enhance immune cell infiltration, though there are concerns regarding VSME sequestration or dysfunction of immune cells, which could impact systemic efficacy. Repeated vaccination at a single site may improve antigen presentation and immune responses, but factors such as injection site location may be linked to variability in clinical outcomes. Current studies are limited by substantial variability in sampling, timing, and analyses used in VSME assessment. This limits the comparability of findings and broader inferences regarding the influence of vaccine site dynamics on therapeutic efficacy. Standardized VSME assessment as part of future vaccine trials may improve evaluation of immune responses and provide a more consistent surrogate for vaccine effectiveness. This refinement may inform optimal vaccine strategies and further support the development of next-generation cancer immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.