ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Progression of Untreated Mild Aortic Valve Disease in Patients Undergoing Rheumatic Mitral Valve Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural history of aortic valve disease after rheumatic mitral valve surgery: implications for concomitant aortic intervention.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Concomitant mild aortic valve disease is frequently found in patients undergoing rheumatic mitral valve surgery. To date, only a limited number of single-center studies have specifically addressed the untreated baseline aortic valve disease long-term progression and reoperation rate. Thus, we conducted a meta and landmark analysis to systematically review the issue. (2) Methods: This study investigated the long-term prognostic of baseline mild aortic valve disease in patients undergoing rheumatic mitral valve surgery, based on evidence from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. (3) Results: Meta analysis revealed that patients with mild aortic valve disease had a higher risk of disease progression, with a 3.3-fold risk in the 0-5-year follow-up, which jumped to a hazard ratio of 6.42 in longer-term follow-up (5-25 years). Patients with aortic stenosis had an 8.37-fold risk of progression compared with aortic regurgitation and appeared to be poorly related to the time cut-off. Similarly, higher reoperation rates at long-term follow-up were seen in aortic stenosis patients. (4) Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with mild aortic valve disease at baseline have poorer long-term aortic valve-related progression and reoperation rates, especially aortic stenosis. For those with concomitant aortic stenosis, further investigation of the impact of lesion progression is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.