ReviewMetabolites2025
Integrating Advanced Metabolomics and Machine Learning for Anti-Doping in Human Athletes.
Review in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Evolution of Precision Anti-Doping From UGT2B17 Polymorphism Insights to Integrated Detection Frameworks.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ongoing challenge of doping in sports has triggered the adoption of advanced scientific strategies for the detection and prevention of doping abuse. This review examines the potential of integrating metabolomics aided by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for profiling small-molecule metabolites across biological systems to advance anti-doping efforts. While traditional targeted detection methods serve a primarily forensic role-providing legally defensible evidence by directly identifying prohibited substances-metabolomics offers complementary insights by revealing both exogenous compounds and endogenous physiological alterations that may persist beyond direct drug detection windows, rather than serving as an alternative to routine forensic testing. High-throughput platforms such as UHPLC-HRMS and NMR, coupled with targeted and untargeted metabolomic workflows, can provide comprehensive datasets that help discriminate between doped and clean athlete profiles. However, the complexity and dimensionality of these datasets necessitate sophisticated computational tools. ML algorithms, including supervised models like XGBoost and multi-layer perceptrons, and unsupervised methods such as clustering and dimensionality reduction, enable robust pattern recognition, classification, and anomaly detection. These approaches enhance both the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic screening and optimize resource allocation. Case studies illustrate the value of integrating metabolomics and ML-for example, detecting recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) use via indirect blood markers and uncovering testosterone and corticosteroid abuse with extended detection windows. Future progress will rely on interdisciplinary collaboration, open-access data infrastructure, and continuous methodological innovation to fully realize the complementary role of these technologies in supporting fair play and athlete well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.