Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41295186›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Perspectives on Vaginal Ecology and Management of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Narrative Review.

Danilla Grando, Cathy J Watson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danilla GrandoSchool of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-9634
Cathy J WatsonCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2816-6956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) affects around three-quarters of women at least once in their lifetime. Around 10% of these women will experience prolonged or recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which fails to respond, despite following recommended therapy. Most commonly prescribed therapy involves suppression therapy-usually for two weeks-which aims at eliminating symptoms by frequent administration of antifungals, followed by maintenance (weekly/monthly) therapy for up to six months. However, following cessation of maintenance therapy, around 50% of these women experience relapse. The vaginal ecology of RVVC can be characterized, and it is thought that biofilms and/or the development of antifungal resistance prevent adequate resolution. However, hypersensitivity may also confound management. This narrative review was performed to identify key studies that examine the management of VVC and the challenges of current prolonged antifungal therapy. It identifies gaps that show it remains important to investigate microbiological findings in RVVC and how these may inform rational choices in therapy in an era of rising antimicrobial resistance. Hope exists, as studies of the vaginal microbiome highlight that the type of microbiota may influence the level of inflammation and reduce symptomatology. Future research will continue to explore whether a personalized medicine approach can promote healthy vaginal ecology and prevent the debilitating long-term effects of RVVC.

Indexed as

community state typesmanagement of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasisvaginal microbiomevulvovaginal candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID41295186
PMCPMC12653331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.