ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Perspectives on Vaginal Ecology and Management of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment recommendations for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis across complementary and conventional disciplines: a national survey of Australian healthcare professionals.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- An In Vitro A-431 Epithelial Cell Infection Model for Studying Fungal Pathogenicity and Immune Responses Associated With Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for cervical cancer: existing AI approaches and the emerging role of vaginal microbiome.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Old but gold: an historical perspective of wet mount microscopy and its current role for the diagnosis of vaginitis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) affects around three-quarters of women at least once in their lifetime. Around 10% of these women will experience prolonged or recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which fails to respond, despite following recommended therapy. Most commonly prescribed therapy involves suppression therapy-usually for two weeks-which aims at eliminating symptoms by frequent administration of antifungals, followed by maintenance (weekly/monthly) therapy for up to six months. However, following cessation of maintenance therapy, around 50% of these women experience relapse. The vaginal ecology of RVVC can be characterized, and it is thought that biofilms and/or the development of antifungal resistance prevent adequate resolution. However, hypersensitivity may also confound management. This narrative review was performed to identify key studies that examine the management of VVC and the challenges of current prolonged antifungal therapy. It identifies gaps that show it remains important to investigate microbiological findings in RVVC and how these may inform rational choices in therapy in an era of rising antimicrobial resistance. Hope exists, as studies of the vaginal microbiome highlight that the type of microbiota may influence the level of inflammation and reduce symptomatology. Future research will continue to explore whether a personalized medicine approach can promote healthy vaginal ecology and prevent the debilitating long-term effects of RVVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.