ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Toward Smarter Orthopedic Care: Classifying Plantar Footprints from RGB Images Using Vision Transformers and CNNs.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The anatomical structure of the foot can be assessed by examining the plantar footprint for orthopedic intervention. In fact, there is a relationship between a specific type of foot and multiple musculoskeletal disorders, which are among the main ailments affecting the lower extremities, where its accurate classification is essential for early diagnosis. This work aims to develop a method for accurately classifying the plantar footprint and hindfoot, specifically concerning the sagittal plane. A custom image dataset was created, comprising 603 RGB plantar images that were modified and augmented. Six state-of-the-art models have been trained and evaluated: swin_tiny_patch4_window7_224, convnextv2_tiny, deit3_base_patch16_224, xception41, inception-v4, and efficientnet_b0. Among them, the swin_tiny_patch4_window7_224 model achieved 98.013% accuracy, demonstrating its potential as a reliable and low-cost tool for clinical screening and diagnosis of foot-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.