Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41295120›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Integrating Deep Learning and Radiogenomics: A Novel Approach to Glioblastoma Segmentation and MGMT Methylation Prediction.

Nabil M Abdelaziz, Emad Abdel-Aziz Dawood, Alshaimaa A Tantawy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nabil M AbdelazizInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-6181-097X
Emad Abdel-Aziz DawoodInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2987-8223
Alshaimaa A TantawyInformation Systems Department, Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6476-9500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiogenomics, which integrates imaging phenotypes with genomic profiles, enhances diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning for glioblastomas. This study specifically establishes a correlation between radiomic features and MGMT promoter methylation status, advancing towards a non-invasive, integrated diagnostic paradigm. Conventional genetic analysis requires invasive biopsies, which cause delays in obtaining results and necessitate further surgeries. Our methodology is twofold: First, an enhanced U-Net model segments brain tumor regions with high precision (Dice coefficient: 0.889). Second, a hybrid classifier, leveraging the complementary features of EfficientNetB0 and ResNet50, predicts MGMT promoter methylation status from the segmented volumes. The proposed framework demonstrated superior performance in predicting MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma patients compared to conventional methods, achieving a classification accuracy of 95% and an AUC of 0.96. These results underscore the model's potential to enhance patient stratification and guide treatment selection. The accurate prediction of MGMT promoter methylation status via non-invasive imaging provides a reliable criterion for anticipating patient responsiveness to alkylating chemotherapy. This capability equips clinicians with a tool to inform personalized treatment strategies, optimizing therapeutic efficacy from the outset.

Indexed as

brain tumorsglioblastomahybrid modelMGMT methylation statusMRI imagesU-Net architecture

Identifiers

PMID41295120
PMCPMC12653240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.