ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Evaluating Feature-Based Homography Pipelines for Dual-Camera Registration in Acupoint Annotation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable acupoint localization is essential for developing artificial intelligence (AI) and extended reality (XR) tools in traditional Korean medicine; however, conventional annotation of 2D images often suffers from inter- and intra-annotator variability. This study presents a low-cost dual-camera imaging system that fuses infrared (IR) and RGB views on a Raspberry Pi 5 platform, incorporating an IR ink pen in conjunction with a 780 nm emitter array to standardize point visibility. Among the tested marking materials, the IR ink showed the highest contrast and visibility under IR illumination, making it the most suitable for acupoint detection. Five feature detectors (SIFT, ORB, KAZE, AKAZE, and BRISK) were evaluated with two matchers (FLANN and BF) to construct representative homography pipelines. Comparative evaluations across multiple camera-to-surface distances revealed that KAZE + FLANN achieved the lowest mean 2D error (1.17 ± 0.70 px) and the lowest mean aspect-aware error (0.08 ± 0.05%) while remaining computationally feasible on the Raspberry Pi 5. In hand-image experiments across multiple postures, the dual-camera registration maintained a mean 2D error below ~3 px and a mean aspect-aware error below ~0.25%, confirming stable and reproducible performance. The proposed framework provides a practical foundation for generating high-quality acupoint datasets, supporting future AI-based localization, XR integration, and automated acupuncture-education systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.