ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Causal Intervention and Counterfactual Reasoning for Multimodal Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pedestrian trajectory prediction is crucial for autonomous systems navigating human-populated environments. However, existing methods face fundamental challenges including spurious correlations induced by confounding social environments, passive uncertainty modeling that limits prediction diversity, and bias coupling during feature interaction that contaminates trajectory representations. To address these issues, we propose a novel Causal Intervention and Counterfactual Reasoning (CICR) framework that shifts trajectory prediction from associative learning to a causal inference paradigm. Our approach features a hierarchical architecture having three core components: a Multisource Encoder that extracts comprehensive spatio-temporal and social context features; a Causal Intervention Fusion Module that eliminates confounding bias through the front-door criterion and cross-attention mechanisms; and a Counterfactual Reasoning Decoder that proactively generates diverse future trajectories by simulating hypothetical scenarios. Extensive experiments on the ETH/UCY, SDD, and AVD datasets demonstrate superior performance, achieving an average ADE/FDE of 0.17/0.24 on ETH/UCY and 7.13/10.29 on SDD, with particular advantages in long-term prediction and cross-domain generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.