Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41295090›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Redefining MRI-Based Skull Segmentation Through AI-Driven Multimodal Integration.

Michel Beyer, Alexander Aigner, Alexandru Burde, Alexander Brasse, Sead Abazi, Lukas B Seifert, Jakob Wasserthal, Martin Segeroth, Mohamed Omar, Florian M Thieringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michel BeyerDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-5377-1530
Alexander AignerDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandru BurdeDepartment of Dental Technology, Faculty of Nursing and Life Sciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-9878
Alexander BrasseDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Sead AbaziDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas B SeifertDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Jakob WasserthalClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Martin SegerothClinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Mohamed OmarSarcoma Centre, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Florian M ThieringerDepartment of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and 3D Print Lab, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3035-9308

Funding

Werner Siemens-Stiftung Miracle II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skull segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for cranio-maxillofacial (CMF) surgery planning, yet manual approaches are time-consuming and error-prone. Computed tomography (CT) provides superior bone contrast but exposes patients to ionizing radiation, which is particularly concerning in pediatric care. This study presents an AI-based workflow that enables skull segmentation directly from routine MRI. Using 186 paired CT-MRI datasets, CT-based segmentations were transferred to MRI via multimodal registration to train dedicated deep learning models. Performance was evaluated against manually segmented CT ground truth using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Mean Surface Distance (MSD), and Hausdorff Distance (HD). AI achieved higher performance on CT (DSC 0.981) than MRI (DSC 0.864), with MSD and HD also favoring CT. Despite lower absolute accuracy on MRI, the approach substantially improved segmentation quality compared with manual MRI methods, particularly in clinically relevant regions. This automated method enables accurate skull modeling from standard MRI without radiation exposure or specialized sequences. While CT remains more precise, the presented framework enhances MRI utility in surgical planning, reduces manual workload, and supports safer, patient-specific treatment, especially for pediatric and trauma cases.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingpersonalized medicinesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41295090
PMCPMC12653806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.