ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Biomechanical Influence of Different Cervical Micro-Thread Forms over Narrow-Diameter Implants (2.9 mm) Using Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Narrow-diameter implants (≤3.5 mm) have garnered significant attention due to their widespread application in areas with insufficient bone volume. However, their mechanical performance is limited. The cervical region, serving as a pivotal stress concentration zone, exhibits a thread form that directly modulates stress distribution and determines the long-term stability of the implant-bone interface. This study was designed to investigate the influence of varying thread forms and face angles on microstrain and stress distribution patterns in narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) and their adjacent cortical bone structures. Through systematic modification of implant thread forms and face angle parameters, finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to develop nine distinct implant models featuring varied geometric characteristics. Each model was implanted into Type III bone tissue, followed by the application of a 100 N occlusal force, including a vertical load and an oblique load deviated 30 degrees lingually from the long axis of the implants. Subsequent biomechanical evaluation quantified peak von Mises stress concentrations at the bone-implant interface, maximum equivalent elastic strain distributions in peri-implant bone tissue, and abutment stress profile characteristics. The results indicated that in the RB thread group, the optimal thread face angle parameter was 60 degrees; in the B thread group, this optimal thread face angle parameter was 45 degrees, whereas in the V thread group, the optimal thread face angle parameter was 30 degrees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.