ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Root Canal Obturation with Hydraulic Condensation and Tricalcium Silicate Bioceramic Sealer: A 12-Month Observational Study on Periapical Healing.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel micro-debulking device for periapical lesion management - A case series.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Five-year clinical outcomes of root canal treatment using a calcium silicate-based sealer in teeth with apical periodontitis: a retrospective cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Resolution of Mental Nerve Paresthesia Associated With a Large Periapical Lesion Following Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment: A Case Report With 6-Year Follow-Up.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Adverse tissue reaction to a next-generation bioceramic sealer: a structured literature review and case report.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of apical micro leakage in root canals obturated with different bio ceramic sealers.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Evaluating success rates of rotary NiTi versus reciprocating files in endodontic treatment.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Successful endodontic treatment relies on effective shaping, disinfection and obturation. Calcium silicate sealers such as BioRoot™ RCS show promise due to their bioactivity and sealing properties, but more clinical evidence using standardized protocols is needed. This observational clinical study aimed to assess periapical healing at 6 and 12 months following single-visit root canal treatment using BioRoot™ RCS with hydraulic condensation in teeth with irreversible pulpitis or apical periodontitis. Sixty-six teeth were treated using a standardized protocol: ProTaper Gold instrumentation, sonic-activated irrigation, and hydraulic condensation with gutta-percha cone and BioRoot™ RCS. Periapical healing was evaluated using the periapical index (PAI) at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Clinical success was defined as functional, asymptomatic teeth and a PAI ≤ 2. Statistical analysis included repeated measures of ANOVA and McNemar's test. All 66 teeth remained asymptomatic and functional of 12 months, yielding a 100% survival rate. Clinical success was confirmed in 97% of cases. PAI scores decreased significantly over time (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.