ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Information-Theoretic ESG Index Direction Forecasting: A Complexity-Aware Framework.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable finance exhibits non-linear dynamics, regime shifts, and distributional drift that challenge conventional forecasting, particularly in volatile emerging markets. Conventional models, which often overlook this structural complexity, can struggle to produce stable or reliable probabilistic forecasts. To address this challenge, this study introduces a complexity-aware forecasting framework that operationalizes information-theoretic meta features, Shannon entropy (SE), permutation entropy (PE) and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to make Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) index forecasting more stable, probabilistically accurate, and operationally reliable. Applied in an emerging-market setting using Türkiye's ESG index as a natural stress test, the framework was benchmarked against a macro-technical baseline with a calibrated XGBoost classifier under a strictly chronological, leakage-controlled nested cross-validation protocol and evaluated on a strictly held-out test set. In development, the framework achieved statistically significant improvements in both stability and calibration, reducing fold-level dispersion (by 40.4-66.6%) across all metrics and enhancing probability-level alignment with Brier score reduced by 0.0140 and the ECE by 0.0287. Furthermore, a meta-analytic McNemar's test confirmed a significant reduction in misclassifications across the development folds. On the strictly held-out test set, the framework's superiority was confirmed by a statistically significant reduction in classification errors (exact McNemar
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.