ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Robust Deep Active Learning via Distance-Measured Data Mixing and Adversarial Training.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate uncertainty estimation in unlabeled data represents a fundamental challenge in active learning. Traditional deep active learning approaches suffer from a critical limitation: uncertainty-based selection strategies tend to concentrate excessively around noisy decision boundaries, while diversity-based methods may miss samples that are crucial for decision-making. This over-reliance on confidence metrics when employing deep neural networks as backbone architectures often results in suboptimal data selection. We introduce Distance-Measured Data Mixing (DM2), a novel framework that estimates sample uncertainty through distance-weighted data mixing to capture inter-sample relationships and the underlying data manifold structure. This approach enables informative sample selection across the entire data distribution while maintaining focus on near-boundary regions without overfitting to the most ambiguous instances. To address noise and instability issues inherent in boundary regions, we propose a boundary-aware feature fusion mechanism integrated with fast gradient adversarial training. This technique generates adversarial counterparts of selected near-boundary samples and trains them jointly with the original instances, thereby enhancing model robustness and generalization capabilities under complex or imbalanced data conditions. Comprehensive experiments across diverse tasks, model architectures, and data modalities demonstrate that our approach consistently surpasses strong uncertainty-based and diversity-based baselines while significantly reducing the number of labeled samples required for effective learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.