ArticleCells2025
Targeting PAK1 or PAK4 Uncovers Different Mechanisms of Vascular Reprogramming in Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The interplay between p21-activated kinases and tumour-infiltrating dendritic cells and T cells and its implication in pancreatic cancer immunotherapy.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tumour microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) regulates vascular function and therapeutic response. P21-activated kinases (PAKs) regulate cytoskeletal dynamics and angiogenesis; however, their roles in vascular reprogramming and chemotherapy responses remain unclear. This study examined the effects of a PAK1 knockdown (PAK1KD) and a PAK4 knockout (PAK4KO) on vascular remodelling in PDA. Human PANC-1 wild-type (WT), PAK1KD, and PAK4KO cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of SCID mice followed gemcitabine treatment. The tumour growth, vascular density, pericyte coverage, adhesion molecules, and hypoxia were determined. A proteomics study was used to identify the molecular changes involved in the vascular pathways. PAK1KD suppressed tumour growth and angiogenesis, promoted vascular normalisation, reduced hypoxia, and increased stromal ICAM-1. PAK4KO inhibited tumour growth, enlarged vessels, enhanced angiogenesis, and reduced hypoxia. PAK4KO did not affect adhesion molecules in the absence of gemcitabine, but markedly upregulated ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 with gemcitabine. Additionally, PAK4KO promoted vascular mimicry (VM) with a compromised integrity in tumour-derived vessels, but enhanced the integrity in endothelial-derived vessels. The proteomics study confirmed the enrichment of molecules in fibronectin and the VEGF pathway in PAK4KO cancer cells, along with the upregulation of EphA2, RhoA, ROCK1, ROCK2, and components of the EPH-ephrin signalling pathway, linking to enhanced VM. Neither PAK1KD nor PAK4KO increased the gemcitabine efficacy. In conclusion, PAK1KD and PAK4KO suppressed tumour growth with distinct vascular effects, but failed to enhance the gemcitabine responses, suggesting that PAK targeting reprograms the PDA vasculature, but offers limited benefit in chemotherapy-resistant models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.