ArticleBiosensors2025
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Individual Cell
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biophysical characteristics of cellular membranes, particularly their electrical properties in the α-dispersion frequency domain, offer valuable insights into cellular states and are increasingly important for cancer diagnostics through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression analysis. However, a critical limitation in these electrical measurements is the confounding effect of morphological changes that inevitably occur during prolonged observation periods. These shape alterations significantly impact measured capacitance values, potentially masking true biological responses to epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation that are essential for cancer detection. In this study, we attempted to address this fundamental challenge by developing a deep learning method that establishes a direct computational relationship between cellular morphology and electrical properties. We combined optical trapping technology and capacitance measurements to generate a comprehensive dataset of HeLa cells under two different experimental conditions: (i) DPBS treatment and (ii) EGF stimulation. Our convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture accurately predicts 401-point capacitance spectra (0.1-2 kHz) from binary morphological images at low frequencies (0.1-0.8 kHz, < 10% error rate). This capability allows for the identification and subtraction of morphology-dependent components from measured capacitance changes, effectively isolating true biological responses from morphological artefacts. The model demonstrates remarkable prediction performance across diverse cell morphologies in both experimental conditions, validating the robust relationship between cellular shape and electrical characteristics. Our method significantly improves the precision and reliability of EGFR-based cancer diagnostics by providing a computational framework for a morphology-induced measurement error correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.