ArticleBiosensors2025
Plant Bioelectrical Signals for Environmental and Emotional State Classification.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ag/AgCl Nanoparticle Incorporation intoBiosensors · 2026Article
- Silent Signals: Correlating Plant Bioelectric Activity with Human Emotional States via Wearable Sensing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we present a pilot investigation using a single Purple Heart plant (Tradescantia pallida) to explore whether bioelectrical signals for dual-purpose classification tasks: environmental state detection and human emotion recognition. Using an AD8232 ECG sensor at 400 Hz sampling rate, we recorded 3 s bioelectrical signal segments with 1 s overlap, converting them to mel-spectrograms for ResNet18 CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) classification. For lamp on/off detection, we achieved 85.4% accuracy with balanced precision (0.85-0.86) and recall (0.84-0.86) metrics across 2767 spectrogram samples. For human emotion classification, our system achieved optimal performance at 73% accuracy with 1 s lag, distinguishing between happy and sad emotional states across 1619 samples. These results should be viewed as preliminary and exploratory, demonstrating feasibility rather than definitive evidence of plant-based emotion sensing. Replication across plants, days, and experimental sites will be essential to establish robustness. The current study is limited by a single-plant setup, modest sample size, and reliance on human face-tracking labels, which together preclude strong claims about generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.