ArticleBiosensors2025
Creation of Machine Learning Models Trained on Multimodal Physiological, Behavioural, Blood Biochemical, and Milk Composition Parameters for the Identification of Lameness in Dairy Cows.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and laboratory biomarkers in veterinary medicine: an update about machine learning applications.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Review
- Hooves, Sensors, and Signals: Precision Approaches to Automated Lameness Detection in Dairy Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Precision Livestock Farming and Biomedical Engineering: Assessing Feed Quality, Animal Health, and Behavior Using Machine Learning for Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of moderate-to-severe postoperative thirst in general anesthesia patients based on automated machine learning and clinical nursing translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lameness remains a significant welfare and productivity challenge in dairy farming, often underdiagnosed due to the limitations of conventional detection methods. Unlike most previous approaches to lameness detection that rely on a single-sensor or gait-based measurement, this study integrates four complementary data domains-behavioural, physiological, biochemical, and milk composition parameters-collected from 272 dairy cows during early lactation to enhance diagnostic accuracy and biological interpretability. The main objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic classification performance of multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on multimodal data collected at the time of clinical lameness diagnosis during early lactation, and to identify the most influential physiological and biochemical traits contributing to classification accuracy. Specifically, six algorithms-random forest (RF), neural network (NN), Ensemble, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and logistic regression (LR)-were assessed. The input dataset integrated physiological parameters (e.g., water intake, body temperature), behavioural indicators (rumination time, activity), blood biochemical biomarkers (non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT)), and milk quality traits (fat, protein, lactose, temperature). Among all models, RF achieved the highest validation accuracy (97.04%), perfect validation specificity (100%), and the highest normalized Matthews correlation coefficient (nMCC = 0.94), as determined through Monte Carlo cross-validation on independent validation sets. Lame cows showed significantly elevated NEFA and body temperatures, reflecting enhanced lipid mobilization and inflammatory stress, alongside reduced water intake, milk protein, and lactose content, indicative of systemic energy imbalance and impaired mammary function. These physiological and biochemical deviations emphasize the multifactorial nature of lameness. Linear models like LR underperformed, likely due to their inability to capture the non-linear and interactive relationships among physiological, biochemical, and milk composition features, which were better represented by tree-based and neural models. Overall, the study demonstrates that combining sensor data with blood biomarkers and milk traits using advanced ML models provides a powerful, objective tool for the clinical classification of lameness, offering practical applications for precision livestock management by supporting early, data-driven decision-making to improve welfare and productivity on dairy farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.