Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294705›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Diversity and Experiences of Radiation Oncologists in Canada: A Survey of Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, Disability, Race, Ethnicity, Religion, and Workplace Discrimination-A National Cross-Sectional Electronic Survey.

Amanda F Khan, Stefan Allen, Ian J Gerard, Rhys Beaudry, Glen Bandiera, David Bowes, Jolie Ringash, Reshma Jagsi, Jennifer Croke, Shaun K Loewen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender disparities in academic radiation oncology research: A narrative review.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  2. The Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology - Underrepresented in Radiation Oncology Mentorship Program (CARO-UROMP).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amanda F KhanDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8834-4435
Stefan AllenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Ian J GerardDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4569-6075
Rhys BeaudryMozell Family Statistical Analysis Core, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Glen BandieraDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
David BowesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Jolie RingashDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Jennifer CrokeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7090-6313
Shaun K LoewenDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.

Funding

American College of Radiation Oncology Luther Brady Educational GrantProfessional Association of Resident Physicians of Alberta Wellness Research Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study's objective was to be the first to explore the ethnicity/cultural origins, gender identity, ability/disability, sexual orientation, socioeconomic background, and harassment/discrimination experiences of Canadian radiation oncologists (ROs).

methodsFollowing a literature review and input from content experts, an ethics-approved national cross-sectional electronic survey was developed in English and French and electronically distributed to all ROs in Canada (

resultsThe survey was completed in full by 42.5% of ROs (254/598). Most respondents were male (62.9%), 35-44 years old (39.2%), and heterosexual (94.3%). 41.2% identified as belonging to a racialized group, which is higher than the overall Canadian population (27%), but Black, Indigenous, and Southeast Asian ROs were underrepresented (1.9% vs. 4%, <1% vs. 5% and 1.6% compared to 4%, respectively). A significant subset analysis showed that only 20% (21/105) of racialized ROs were women, whereas Caucasian women comprised 49.3% (74/150) of Caucasian respondents (

conclusionsThis study highlights high harassment and discrimination rates amongst Canadian ROs, especially amongst racialized women, which may affect career satisfaction and attrition rates. Compared to census data, Black, Indigenous, and Southeast Asian ROs were underrepresented, and amongst racialized ROs, racialized women were significantly underrepresented. These findings underscore the need for targeted diversity initiatives, improved mentorship programs, and stronger institutional policies to address harassment and foster an inclusive work environment.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityRadiation OncologistsAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsSexual BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceageCanadiandiversityequityethnicitygenderharassmentraceradiation oncologistsworkplace discrimination

Identifiers

PMID41294705
PMCPMC12651478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.