Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294670›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Endoscopic Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction: Where Do We Stand Today? A Narrative Review.

Tadahisa Inoue, Itaru Naitoh, Michihiro Yoshida, Fumihiro Okumura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tadahisa InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0718-9099
Itaru NaitohDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya City University Midori Municipal Hospital, 1-77 Shiomigaoka, Midori-ku, Nagoya 458-0037, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-886X
Michihiro YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4167-2781
Fumihiro OkumuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, 5-161 Maehata-cho, Tajimi 507-8522, Gifu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is a complex clinical condition commonly observed in individuals with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and other hepatobiliary malignancies. Endoscopic stenting remains the primary palliative intervention for unresectable cases; however, the optimal strategy has not been clearly defined owing to the anatomical intricacies of the hilar region and the heterogeneity of disease presentation. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and ongoing debates on functional liver volume-based drainage, unilateral versus bilateral stenting, stent type selection, and above-the-papilla approaches. In addition, we highlight recent progress in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage as a promising alternative or complementary approach when conventional transpapillary drainage proves inadequate. With recent advances in systemic therapies, including immunotherapy, patient survival has improved, underscoring the need for durable, reintervention-friendly stent strategies. Although uncovered metal stents have long been regarded as the standard for unresectable cases, their limitations in reintervention have prompted renewed consideration of both stent type and drainage technique. Robust prospective studies remain essential to establish standardized, evidence-based guidelines that optimize patient benefit and improve long-term outcomes in unresectable MHBO.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholestasisStentsDrainageHumansPalliative Caremalignant hilar biliary obstructionmetal stentplastic stent

Identifiers

PMID41294670
PMCPMC12650976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.