Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294653›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening in Northern Uganda: Qualitative Insights from Healthcare Workers and Administrators.

Noemi Maria Felisi, David Oyet, Kayeny Miriam Melody Yung, Emmanuel Ochola, Riccardo Vecchio, Anna Odone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noemi Maria FelisiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20121 Milan, Italy.
David OyetDepartment of Paediatric Oncology, St. Mary's Hospital, Lacor, Gulu P.O. Box 180, Uganda.
Kayeny Miriam Melody YungDepartment of HIV, Research and Documentation, St. Mary's Hospital, Lacor, Gulu P.O. Box 180, Uganda.
Emmanuel OcholaDepartment of HIV, Research and Documentation, St. Mary's Hospital, Lacor, Gulu P.O. Box 180, Uganda.
Riccardo VecchioPhD National Programme in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-8733
Anna OdoneDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-4975-8188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is the most common cancer among Ugandan women and the leading cause of cancer mortality. Screening has proven to be a cost-effective method in reducing its burden, yet uptake among women of reproductive age remains alarmingly low, with national adherence rates under 10%.

objectiveThis study explored healthcare workers' (HWs) perspectives on barriers and facilitators to screening and attitudes toward implementing human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing with self-collection.

methodsA qualitative research design was employed. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled healthcare providers and administrators across different cadres at a referral hospital and three peripheral health centres in Northern Uganda. Interviews were analysed thematically using the Social Ecological Model. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively until thematic saturation. Reporting follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).

resultsParticipants described individual and interpersonal barriers such as limited awareness, poor preventive health-seeking, fear of results, stigma, and limited male involvement. Organisational barriers included staff shortages, weak referral practices, and stock-outs of supplies, while policy constraints included limited governmental support and competing priorities. Facilitators included targeted health education, routine referrals from all service entry points, outreach screening, and donor support. Most respondents favoured scaling up of self-collected HPV testing, citing higher acceptability and feasibility for outreach, contingent on sustained supplies, laboratory capacity, and training.

conclusionsMulti-level interventions are needed to strengthen facility workflows, staff capability, community engagement, and reliable supply chains. Expanding access to self-collected HPV testing may overcome major barriers and represents a promising strategy to increase screening uptake in Uganda and similar low resource settings.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth PersonnelUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUgandacervical cancerhealthcare workersHPV self-samplingimplementationqualitative studyscreening

Identifiers

PMID41294653
PMCPMC12651664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.