ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Comparative Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy and Cold Knife Conization for Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy of the Human Papillomavirus-Related Cervical Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Possible spatially-distinctFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) offers a non-invasive alternative for managing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This comparative study assessed the efficacy and safety of 5-ALA PDT versus cervical conization in treating HSIL. (2) Methods: A total of 137 patients with HSIL and HPV infection, confirmed by pathological biopsy, were included. Based on patient preference and gynecological evaluation, participants were allocated into the PDT group and the CKC group. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 months post-treatment, involving HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy. Additionally, any discomfort or side effects experienced during treatment were documented, along with a preliminary analysis of treatment costs and duration. (3) Results: The overall lesion remission rates were 88.0% for the PDT group and 89.6% for the CKC group, while HPV clearance rates were 80.0% and 82.7%, respectively. Although no statistically significant difference in efficacy was observed between the two groups, the PDT group exhibited a notably lower incidence of side effects. Nevertheless, the PDT group was associated with higher costs and longer treatment duration. (4) Conclusions: These findings indicate that 5-ALA PDT achieves comparable efficacy to CKC in the treatment of HSIL. Therefore, PDT may serve as a valuable therapeutic option for patients seeking fertility preservation or less invasive management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.