ReviewClinics and practice2025
Assessing the Oral Microbiome in Women of Reproductive Age: A Narrative Review.
Review in Clinics and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oral microbiome may be an indicator of oral pathologies and hormonal fluctuations. Consequently, the proper identification of methods for studying microbial factors is essential. Because more than half of the components of the oral microbiome belong to species that are very difficult or even impossible to cultivate in the laboratory, the assessment of the oral microbiome nowadays is based on genetic sequencing, using techniques such as DNA hybridization, 16S rRNA sequencing, and metagenomics, mainly analyzing saliva and subgingival plaque. Variations in results may be caused by differences in sample type, analysis methods, accuracy in determining cycle phases, and biases introduced by DNA extraction techniques and technical variations. Choosing the right primers for the 16S rRNA gene and reference databases (like HOMD, Greengenes2) is essential for accurately identifying microorganisms. Metagenomic sequencing offers greater taxonomic and functional detail, but it is costlier and presents bioinformatics challenges, including contamination with human DNA. When the patients under study are women, we have to take into consideration the cyclical changes in the menstrual cycle. Studies suggest that estrogen influences local immune and inflammatory responses and can worsen existing gingival inflammation. Certain oral bacteria can even utilize estradiol and progesterone as growth factors. The composition of the oral microbiome is also affected by hormonal contraceptives, carbohydrate intake, smoking, age, body mass index, genetics, and oral hygiene-all factors that need to be controlled for in future studies. Interpreting the biological significance of the reported cyclic changes requires careful examination of the specific methods used in each study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.