ReviewClinics and practice2025
Giant Asymptomatic Submandibular Sialolith: A Case Report Accompanied by Systematic Review.
Review in Clinics and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesSalivary stones, also known as sialoliths, are calcified structures that develop within the salivary glands and/or their ducts. They occur in approximately 1 per 10,000 to 30,000 individuals per year, primarily affecting adults between 30 and 50 years of age. Although several hypotheses have been proposed, the exact mechanisms of formation and their predisposing factors are yet to be confirmed. The submandibular gland is the most commonly affected site, accounting for nearly 80% of cases, while giant and asymptomatic sialoliths are rare clinical findings in dental practice. This study is divided into two components: first, a case report of a giant, asymptomatic sialolith located in Wharton's duct; second, a systematic review of the literature to explore the clinical procedures, diagnoses, outcomes, and other relevant aspects of this pathology.
methodsThe case involved a 42-year-old woman who sought dental care due to the presence of a painless sublingual swelling. Intraoral examination and imaging revealed a calcified mass consistent with sialolithiasis in Wharton's duct. The stone was successfully removed via sialolithotomy. For the systematic review, an extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2025, using specific keywords. Initially, 262 studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, six case reports were included in the final analysis.
resultsAll selected studies described giant salivary stones located in Wharton's duct and/or the parenchyma of the submandibular gland, notably without associated pain. Computed tomography and ultrasonography were the most commonly used imaging modalities for diagnosis. In all cases, the primary treatment was sialolithotomy.
conclusionsThis study explored a rare case report of an asymptomatic giant sialolith in Wharton's duct, and it includes a systematic review focused exclusively on asymptomatic giant sialoliths. It specifically addresses key characteristics, preferred imaging modalities, treatment strategies, and clinical considerations for managing this uncommon condition. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Prospero registration nº CRD420251076737.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.