Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41294612›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Cellulose Nanofibrils vs Nanocrystals: Rheology of Suspensions and Hydrogels.

Alexander S Ospennikov, Alexander L Kwiatkowski, Olga E Philippova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander S OspennikovPhysics Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander L KwiatkowskiPhysics Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0514-384X
Olga E PhilippovaPhysics Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-0255

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-13-00177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-derived nanocellulose particles, such as cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), are becoming increasingly popular for a wide range of applications. In particular, when they are employed as rheology modifiers and/or fillers, a choice between CNFs and CNCs is often not obvious. Here, we present the results of a comparative study on the rheological properties of suspensions and gels of carboxymethylated CNFs and CNCs with the same surface chemistry, surface density of charged groups, and thickness. We demonstrate that, at the same weight concentration, CNF suspensions have much higher viscosity and storage modulus, which is due to their longer length providing many entanglements. However, when comparing at the same nanoparticle concentration relative to C*, the situation is reversed: viscosity and storage modulus of CNCs appear to be much higher. This may be due in particular to the higher rigidity and intrinsic strength of highly crystalline CNCs. The gel points for CNF and CNC suspensions (without crosslinker) were compared for the first time. It was found that in the case of CNFs, the gel point occurs at a 3.5-fold lower concentration compared to that of CNCs. Hydrogels were also obtained by crosslinking negatively charged nanocellulose particles of both types by divalent calcium cations. For the first time, the thermodynamic parameters of the crosslinking of carboxymethylated CNFs by calcium ions were determined. Isothermal titration calorimetry data revealed that, for both CNFs and CNCs, crosslinking is endothermic and driven by increasing entropy, which is most likely due to the release of water molecules surrounding the interacting nanoparticles and Ca

Indexed as

cellulose nanocrystalscellulose nanofibrilscrosslinkinghydrogelsrheological properties

Identifiers

PMID41294612
PMCPMC12652647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.